Your customer's agent, not your customer: who's doing the shopping now.

What wins this kind of customer

Say someone's set up a standing assistant to keep their household stocked: reorder washing powder when it's running low, replace a coffee it's noticed they buy every few weeks, compare a couple of options if the usual brand's out of stock. Nobody sits down to shop for any of this. The assistant already knows the person's preferences, their usual spend, their size if it's relevant, and it acts on all of that without a session, a browse, or a single click from the person it's shopping for.

This is a different kind of customer to design for, not a variant of the one a shop already knows. A person browsing can be caught by a good photo, a persuasive headline, a discount banner at the right moment. A standing agent checks facts against what it already knows its person wants, and either finds a match or doesn't, unmoved by any of that. Marketing aimed at catching attention has nothing to catch, because there's no attention in the room to catch.

Being correctly matched to what the agent already knows about its person, specific size, specific preference, specific price range, checked reliably every time, not persuaded once. A shop that's clear and current on exactly the facts a standing agent checks, and consistently is, wins repeat business from a customer who never manually reconsiders the choice each time. A shop relying on being rediscovered and re-persuaded on each visit has nothing to offer a customer who isn't visiting at all.

What happens the first time the usual choice runs out

The real test of this relationship comes the moment the agent's default option isn't available: the usual coffee is out of stock, the usual size is sold through. A person in that situation can be persuaded into an alternative by a good offer, a nice photo, a limited-time discount. A standing agent compares the alternatives the same way it would have compared them the first time, against the same facts, price, size, whatever matters to its person, and picks whichever one is genuinely closest, regardless of how loudly any of them are asking to be chosen. This is the moment a shop either earns a second, unplanned sale by having its facts in good order, or loses one entirely to a competitor the agent had never previously considered, purely because that competitor's facts happened to answer the question more completely.

This is a small share of purchases today, and the fastest-growing part of the picture

Being a small share now makes it easy to treat as a niche case not worth building for yet. That's the wrong read of a trend rather than a snapshot: it rewards exactly the same underlying work, clear, current, checkable facts, connected to something that can complete a purchase, that every other piece in this hub has been about. Nothing about preparing for a standing agent is separate work from preparing for agentic commerce generally. It's the same work, aimed at a customer who's already made the decision to delegate, which is precisely why it compounds rather than staying niche.

That's the layer Selfe exists to build for this case specifically: making sure a shop's real facts are checkable and current enough that a standing agent, acting quietly on someone's behalf, keeps choosing it without either party ever needing a persuasive moment to make that happen. See "Being found is not the same as being bought from" for the buying side of this same test: a standing agent still has to check a real fact and complete a real purchase, no mention required. For how a business declares exactly what it's right for, in a way an agent can check every time, see how we think about matching as its own job.

How would we even know if this kind of customer is buying from us?

Check your own order data for repeat purchases with no browsing activity attached. That pattern is the tell.

Do we need a different approach for this versus a person browsing?

No, the same clear, current, checkable facts serve both. What differs is that a standing agent has no patience for anything that isn't already true and checkable.